/// Convert a tag into a field number and a WireType. fn unpack_tag(tag: u64) -> Result<(u64, WireType), Error> { let field_num = tag >> 3; 132 let wire_type = WireType::try_from(tag & 0x7)?; Ok((field_num parse_field(data: &[u8]) -> Result<(Field, &[u8]), Error> { let (tag, remainder) = parse_varint(data)?; let (field_num, wire_type) = unpack_tag(tag)?; let (fieldvalue, remainder) = match wire_type { _ => todo } /// Convert a tag into a field number and a WireType. fn unpack_tag(tag: u64) -> Result<(u64, WireType), Error> { let field_num = tag >> 3; let wire_type = WireType::try_from(tag & 0x7)?; Ok((field_num

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Example Description mutable struct BitSet "Leaf Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a leaf type

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Example Description mutable struct BitSet "Leaf Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a leaf type

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Example Description mutable struct BitSet "Leaf Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a leaf type

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Example Description mutable struct BitSet "Leaf Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a leaf type

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Example Description mutable struct BitSet "Leaf Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a leaf type

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Description mutable struct BitSet "Concrete Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a concrete

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Description mutable struct BitSet "Concrete Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a concrete

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Description mutable struct BitSet "Concrete Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a concrete

that the type parameter T is not used in the definition of the type itself – it is just an abstract tag, essentially defining an entire family of types with identical structure, differentiated only by their 4-element Vector{Float64}: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Had we tried to do the addition without the atomic tag, we might have gotten the wrong answer due to a race condition. An example of what would happen if Description mutable struct BitSet "Concrete Type" :: A group of related data that includes a type-tag, is managed by the Julia GC, and is defined by object-identity. The type parameters of a concrete