all iterable C++ types. for (T x : list ) { ... } It will work with standard tooling and static analysis, and can be faster by defaulting to in-place access. For this reason range-based iterators should is faster. Personally I like the range-based for in principle, since it works better with static analysis, it has a faster best-case speed, and it is always possible to write it in a way that replicates

Rust, not necessarily a good example to copy for production code. • cargo-call-stack – Static analysis to determine maximum stack usage. • RaspberryPi OS 튜토리얼에서는 MMU 와 캐시가 사용 설정되기 전에 Rust 코드를 실행합니다

Rust, not necessarily a good example to copy for production code. • cargo-call-stack – Static analysis to determine maximum stack usage. • RaspberryPi OS 튜토리얼에서는 MMU 와 캐시가 사용 설정되기 전에 Rust 코드를 실행합니다