must become. Uncertainty and Risk: Third, underlying all of these changes – all of the problems with plan-drive approaches, all of the advantages of Agile approaches – is a confusion about how to deal with thinking simply says that we should empower small teams to inspect and adapt rather than stick to a plan. Lean thinking gives that small team ways to speed up its inspecting and adapting process to maximize should reject the plan-driven approach to IT is that it espouses all the wrong values.  What is the value of rigidity and executing according to plan if you could be improving on the plan or responding

io/JeaO2 Risk The presence of uncertainty is the simple reason why Agile approaches work better than plan-driven approaches—it is also the reason why a good IT leader will often have to make “wrong” decisions uncertainty, your choices will often turn out to be wrong.Agile and plan-driven models have very different ways of dealing with uncertainty. Plan driven approaches, even Waterfall, have always acknowledged that eventuality whose impact required mitigation.  The basic plan would remain valid, and the risk of the unexpected could be managed within the plan by itemizing potential risks, actively working to prevent

alongside you.” – Mark Schwartz Last Time in Part One Planning: The idea that we should make a plan and then stick to it is a terrible idea in an environment of uncertainty and change. It has dominated the features that have been deployed.  we would carefully set boundaries for planning. A detailed plan is a less effective basis for governance than validated learning based on actual delivery. The more budget—I can decide whether the business case for the investment is still attractive. Often, the plan for the future is to continue exploring the ideas originally brainstormed in the impact map. That

state does is make decisions. We want to find a way to leave less paper on a desk.”1 The governor’s plan has five points that could have been plucked from any campaign platform: 1. A “world-class”

of DevSecOps is to automate, monitor, and apply security at all phases of the software lifecycle: plan, develop, build, test, release, deliver, deploy, operate, and monitor. In DevSecOps, testing and security

infrastructure and services for items that are causing disproportionate amounts of failure and unplanned work; plan for elimination or replacement iii. Create “buoys, not boundaries”; navigate the channel, mark the