enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic 2CHAPTER 1. JULIA 1.11 DOCUMENTATION 3 language, appropriate for scientific an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic 2CHAPTER 1. JULIA 1.11 DOCUMENTATION 3 language, appropriate for scientific an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic 2CHAPTER 1. JULIA 1.11 DOCUMENTATION 3 language, appropriate for scientific an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic language, appropriate for scientific and numerical computing, with performance an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic language, appropriate for scientific and numerical computing, with performance an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic language, appropriate for scientific and numerical computing, with performance an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic language, appropriate for scientific and numerical computing, with performance an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic language, appropriate for scientific and numerical computing, with performance an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic language, appropriate for scientific and numerical computing, with performance an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)

enough for deploying performance-intensive applications. The Julia programming language fills this role: it is a flexible dynamic language, appropriate for scientific and numerical computing, with performance an argument list when really necessary. For simple functions, it is often clearer to mention the role of the arguments directly in the de- scription of the function's purpose. An argument list would small enough to fit into the L1 cache of the processor, so that memory access latency does not play a role, and computing time is dominated by CPU usage. In many real world programs this is not the case.)