indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one ’best’ variant, so return it as the response. The

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one 'best' variant, so return it as the response.

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one 'best' variant, so return it as the response.

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one 'best' variant, so return it as the response.

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one 'best' variant, so return it as the response.

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one 'best' variant, so return it as the response.

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one ’best’ variant, so return it as the response. The

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one 'best' variant, so return it as the response.

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one 'best' variant, so return it as the response.

indicated by the "qs" parameter to the media type, as in this picture (available as JPEG, GIF, or ASCII-art): URI: foo URI: foo.jpeg Content-type: image/jpeg; qs=0.8 URI: foo.gif Content-type: image/gif; higher source quality than an ASCII file if it is attempting to represent a photograph. However, if the resource being represented is an original ASCII art, then an ASCII representation would have a higher when variants are read from the directory, the one whose file name comes first when sorted using ASCII code order. 3. The algorithm has now selected one 'best' variant, so return it as the response.