libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. Conan multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally

libraries, binaries) from the build and source folder to a predetermined place and maybe do some post-processing of those artifacts. This will work without changes in your CMakeLists.txt because Conan will set feedback from users was gathered, and it became evident than in C++ the versioning scheme is often more complex, and users were demanding more flexibility, allowing versions like 1.2.3.a.8 if necessary. The ordering multiple conditions with the OR operator, like requires = "pkg/[>1 <2.0 || ^3.2]" but this kind of complex expressions is not recommended in practice and should only be used in very extreme cases. Finally