related to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming environment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [20] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effectively as it could. [21] Nim is already supported by more than

related to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming environment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [20] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effectively as it could. [21] Nim is already supported by more than

compilation starts always from the main module of great benefit for HCR/REPL more features better tooling better docs taking over the world get involved - still in early stages - you can have an impact

to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming envi­ 34 ronment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [6] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important may not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effec­ tively as it could. [7] Nim is already supported by more

related to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming envi­ ronment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [6] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important may not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effec­ tively as it could. [7] Nim is already supported by more

to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming envi­ 34 ronment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [6] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important may not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effec­ tively as it could. [7] Nim is already supported by more

related to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming envi­ ronment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [6] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important may not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effec­ tively as it could. [7] Nim is already supported by more

related to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming envi­ ronment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [6] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important may not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effec­ tively as it could. [7] Nim is already supported by more

related to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming envi­ ronment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [6] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important may not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effec­ tively as it could. [7] Nim is already supported by more

related to the Nim language itself, but to the user experience, is the programming envi­ ronment or tooling: editors, IDEs, REPL (read–eval–print loop), package managers, and debugging and profiling support [6] However, all this tooling is more of an implementation detail and not a direct issue of the language. Since Nim is a high-level language with very clear syntax, tooling should not be that important may not be a significant demand for robust debugger support. In fact, Nim already has all of this tooling; it just doesn’t function as effec­ tively as it could. [7] Nim is already supported by more