exis�ng commi�ers discuss the pros and cons of gran�ng commit access to the candidate in the email thread. When the discussion has converged or a reasonable �me has elapsed without discussion developing final decision on the candidate with a followup email to the thread. Each commi�er may vote yes, no, or abstain by replying to the email thread. A failure to reply is an implicit absten�on. A�er votes from change. Ideally the behavior is eliminated and no further ac�on is required. If not, Start an email thread with all commi�ers, including the source of the behavior, describing the behavior and the reason

existing committers discuss the pros and cons of granting commit access to the candidate in the email thread. When the discussion has converged or a reasonable time has elapsed without discussion developing final decision on the candidate with a followup email to the thread. Each committer may vote yes, no, or abstain by replying to the email thread. A failure to reply is an implicit abstention. After votes change. Ideally the behavior is eliminated and no further action is required. If not, Start an email thread with all committers, including the source of the behavior, describing the behavior and the reason

existing committers discuss the pros and cons of granting commit access to the candidate in the email thread. When the discussion has converged or a reasonable time has elapsed without discussion developing final decision on the candidate with a followup email to the thread. Each committer may vote yes, no, or abstain by replying to the email thread. A failure to reply is an implicit abstention. After votes change. Ideally the behavior is eliminated and no further action is required. If not, Start an email thread with all committers, including the source of the behavior, describing the behavior and the reason

existing committers discuss the pros and cons of granting commit access to the candidate in the email thread. When the discussion has converged or a reasonable time has elapsed without discussion developing final decision on the candidate with a followup email to the thread. Each committer may vote yes, no, or abstain by replying to the email thread. A failure to reply is an implicit abstention. After votes change. Ideally the behavior is eliminated and no further action is required. If not, Start an email thread with all committers, including the source of the behavior, describing the behavior and the reason

existing committers discuss the pros and cons of granting commit access to the candidate in the email thread. When the discussion has converged or a reasonable time has elapsed without discussion developing final decision on the candidate with a followup email to the thread. Each committer may vote yes, no, or abstain by replying to the email thread. A failure to reply is an implicit abstention. After votes change. Ideally the behavior is eliminated and no further action is required. If not, Start an email thread with all committers, including the source of the behavior, describing the behavior and the reason

syscall, etc) BPF code (bpf/rbperf.c) Read frame Driver (rbperf.py) 1. Adds info (pid to profile, thread address) 3. Receives stacktrace 4. Serialisation and persistence BPF tail-calls Bounded loop

breakpoint.py 0xffffffffaa2623b0 -1 3 Kernel Stack : scan_block scan_gray_list kmemleak_scan kmemleak_scan_thread kthread ret_from_fork User Stack : - kmemleak (161) 04 Output ● Incorporate comments ○ Add len

existing committers discuss the pros and cons of granting commit access to the candidate in the Slack thread. When the discussion has converged or a reasonable time has elapsed without discussion developing change. Ideally the behavior is eliminated and no further action is required. If not, Start a Slack thread with all committers, including the source of the behavior, describing the behavior and the reason discussion provides more perspective to all participants and the issue is resolved. If not, Start a Slack thread with all committers except the source of the detrimental behavior requesting a vote on revocation

existing committers discuss the pros and cons of granting commit access to the candidate in the Slack thread. When the discussion has converged or a reasonable time has elapsed without discussion developing change. Ideally the behavior is eliminated and no further action is required. If not, Start a Slack thread with all committers, including the source of the behavior, describing the behavior and the reason discussion provides more perspective to all participants and the issue is resolved. If not, Start a Slack thread with all committers except the source of the detrimental behavior requesting a vote on revocation