implementation. 15.9.2. Upgrading from 2.26.0 Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J-supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs is one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default (i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host}), however the system property must be supplied in of the shell is that it will reuse some information as you repeat commands. For example, once you supply the broker URI and username & password to one command those values will be transparently applied

implementation. 15.7.2. Upgrading from 2.26.0 Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J-supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs is one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default (i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host}), however the system property must be supplied in of the shell is that it will reuse some information as you repeat commands. For example, once you supply the broker URI and username & password to one command those values will be transparently applied

implementation. 15.8.2. Upgrading from 2.26.0 Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J-supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs is one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default (i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host}), however the system property must be supplied in of the shell is that it will reuse some information as you repeat commands. For example, once you supply the broker URI and username & password to one command those values will be transparently applied

implementation. Upgrading from older versions Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J- supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default. i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host} , however the system property must be supplied process using the service url: service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi You'd be able to supply an appropriate user name and password in this case as well. Management 267 You can also configure

implementation. Upgrading from older versions Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J- supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default. i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host} , however the system property must be supplied process using the service url: service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi You'd be able to supply an appropriate user name and password in this case as well. Management 267 You can also configure

implementation. 15.14.2. Upgrading from 2.26.0 Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J-supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs is one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default (i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host}), however the system property must be supplied in of the shell is that it will reuse some information as you repeat commands. For example, once you supply the broker URI and username & password to one command those values will be transparently applied

implementation. 15.13.2. Upgrading from 2.26.0 Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J-supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs is one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default (i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host}), however the system property must be supplied in of the shell is that it will reuse some information as you repeat commands. For example, once you supply the broker URI and username & password to one command those values will be transparently applied

implementation. 15.12.2. Upgrading from 2.26.0 Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J-supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs is one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default (i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host}), however the system property must be supplied in of the shell is that it will reuse some information as you repeat commands. For example, once you supply the broker URI and username & password to one command those values will be transparently applied

implementation. 15.11.2. Upgrading from 2.26.0 Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J-supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs is one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default (i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host}), however the system property must be supplied in of the shell is that it will reuse some information as you repeat commands. For example, once you supply the broker URI and username & password to one command those values will be transparently applied

implementation. 15.6.2. Upgrading from 2.26.0 Client applications wanting logging will now need to supply an appropriate SLF4J-supporting logging implementation configured appropriately for their needs is one, if not they default back to localhost or 61616 respectively. It is also possible to not supply a default (i.e. ${activemq.remoting.netty.host}), however the system property must be supplied in process using the service url: service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi You’d be able to supply an appropriate user name and password in this case as well. You can also configure the connector