original [framework] code).” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “Falcon is rock solid and it’s fast.” effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features • ASGI and WSGI Support • WebSocket Support • Native asyncio support (no hacks or compatibility used to optimize the framework as explained above. WSGI Server Falcon speaks WSGI, and so in order to serve a Falcon app, you will need a WSGI server. Gunicorn and uWSGI are some of the more popular ones

original [framework] code).” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “Falcon is rock solid and it’s fast.” do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. • ASGI, WSGI, and WebSocket support • Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features Falcon tries to do as little as

original [framework] code).” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “Falcon is rock solid and it’s fast.” do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. • ASGI, WSGI, and WebSocket support • Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features Falcon tries to do as little as

original [framework] code).” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “Falcon is rock solid and it’s fast.” tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 2.7/3.5+ and PyPy. How is Falcon different? We designed Falcon application in production, you may wish to compile Falcon via Cython yourself, using the target system’s native toolchain. The following commands tell pip to install Cython, and then to invoke Falcon’s setup

original [framework] code).” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “Falcon is rock solid and it’s fast.” effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features • ASGI and WSGI Support • WebSocket Support • Native asyncio support (no hacks or compatibility used to optimize the framework as explained above. WSGI Server Falcon speaks WSGI, and so in order to serve a Falcon app, you will need a WSGI server. Gunicorn and uWSGI are some of the more popular ones

speed and flexibility I need!” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “I feel like I’m just talking HTTP at do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. • ASGI, WSGI, and WebSocket support • Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features Falcon tries to do as little as

speed and flexibility I need!” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “I feel like I’m just talking HTTP at do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. • ASGI, WSGI, and WebSocket support • Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features Falcon tries to do as little as

speed and flexibility I need!” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “I feel like I’m just talking HTTP at do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. • ASGI, WSGI, and WebSocket support • Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features Falcon tries to do as little as

speed and flexibility I need!” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “I feel like I’m just talking HTTP at do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. • ASGI, WSGI, and WebSocket support • Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features Falcon tries to do as little as

speed and flexibility I need!” “Falcon looks great so far. I hacked together a quick test for a tiny server of mine and was ~40% faster with only 20 minutes of work.” “I feel like I’m just talking HTTP at do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. • ASGI, WSGI, and WebSocket support • Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. Falcon apps work with any WSGI server, and run like a champ under CPython 3.5+ and PyPy 3.5+. Features Falcon tries to do as little as