Handles actual traffic Can be standalone or sidecar Other Container Istio Sidecar Proxy Istio Ingress Gateway Istio Egress Gateway @rytswd Istio Operator istio-operator Manages Istio installation Demo What’s next? Control Plane Data Plane istiod Some container Istio Sidecar Proxy Istio Ingress Gateway Istio Egress Gateway @rytswd DestinationRule ServiceEntry Gateway VirtualService Some Demo What’s next? Control Plane Data Plane istiod Some container Istio Sidecar Proxy Istio Ingress Gateway Istio Egress Gateway @rytswd DestinationRule ServiceEntry Gateway VirtualService Some

is made up of a Deployment, a Service, and a Route (which could be replaced by an Ingress if you’re using an ingress controller). These manifests are generally the same, and there are only slight differences usually parameterize when you don’t know something about the cluster ahead of time (for example, the Ingress “host” field in the YAML). You can use Helm to parameterize the configuration and just supply the great when you already know the configurations and deltas beforehand. An example of this is the Ingress Object in Kubernetes [5.1]. This configuration has a host field in the YAML manifest that is supposed

developers are working on an MVP. Everything we do is based on Zero Trust architecture - both for ingress, egress, and east-west traffic. We use the Istio service mesh, and that’s the foundation of everything communication. Sidecars, which are language agnostic, act as service proxies and allow for all traffic (ingress and egress) to flow through them before reaching or leaving a container. This greatly improves security

## 定义各种下层基础设施可理解的声明式 spec │ ├── _helpers.tpl │ ├── hpa.yaml │ ├── ingress.yaml │ ├── prometheusrule.yaml │ ├── deployment.yaml │ └── service.yaml ├── files

#Required │ ├── deployment.yaml │ ├── _helpers.tpl │ ├── hpa.yaml │ ├── ingress.yaml │ ├── NOTES.txt │ ├── serviceaccount.yaml │ ├── service.yaml │ └── tests │