exposed via the Istio sidecar and would allow a malicious workload to override or compromise their own Istio configuration. Strategic Recommendations • Build opinionated profiles for security: Istio allows being used to control whether to select all Gateways or just those from the ingress gateway proxy’s own namespace. 3https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/gateway/#Gateway 4https://istio controls are also currently disabled in Kubernetes by default but as Istio has full control over its own Pods and Deployments, they can easily enable these features but currently do not. There are examples

can produce those items. ● Sponsoring vendors will set up a seperate registration form on their own platform, directed from the event site. The participants who want to receive gifts will share their their services, discount codes, etc. ● Sponsors will set up a seperate registration form on their own platform, directed from the event site. The participants who want to receive gifts will share their

experimental. There is no guarantee that they will not be deprecated in a future release. Use at your own discretion. ● To enable this, users must set the ECC_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM environmental variable on

The GitHub repository host also a HelmChart that you can use to deploy istio-redirector on your own cluster. Feel free to reach to me for any questions if you want to implement it in your company!

sidecar CR helps to limit the known egress hosts for sidecars, sidecar needs to knows mesh in his own user namespace only. o We can limit the mesh size to namespace scope for all user namespaces easily

application in an Istio service mesh, but the inter-services communication are done by AwesomePRC, our own RPC protocol, instead of HTTP. So, how could we achieve layer-7 traffic management for AwesomeRPC