their transports are also open) often generates many more transports than the comparable construction with paths would. As an example, compare the proof of uaβEq below has four pending transports, whereas constructors of some other inductive type, pattern-matching definitions will not compute when applied to transports. For specific unsupported cases, see What works, and what doesn’t. If the UnsupportedIndexedMatch warning for every definition whose computational behaviour could not be extended to cover transports. Internally, transports are represented by an additional constructor, and pattern-matching definitions must

their transports are also open) often generates many more transports than the comparable construction with paths would. As an example, compare the proof of ua? Eq below has four pending transports, whereas constructors of some other inductive type, pattern-matching definitions will not compute when applied to transports. For specific unsupported cases, see What works, and what doesn’t. If the UnsupportedIndexedMatch warning for every definition whose computational behaviour could not be extended to cover transports. Internally, transports are represented by an additional constructor, and pattern-matching definitions must

their transports are also open) often generates many more transports than the comparable construction with paths would. As an example, compare the proof of ua? Eq below has four pending transports, whereas constructors of some other inductive type, pattern-matching definitions will not compute when applied to transports. For specific unsupported cases, see What works, and what doesn’t. If the UnsupportedIndexedMatch warning for every definition whose computational behaviour could not be extended to cover transports. Internally, transports are represented by an additional constructor, and pattern-matching definitions must

their transports are also open) often generates many more transports than the comparable construction with paths would. As an example, compare the proof of ua? Eq below has four pending transports, whereas constructors of some other inductive type, pattern-matching definitions will not compute when applied to transports. For specific unsupported cases, see What works, and what doesn’t. If the UnsupportedIndexedMatch warning for every definition whose computational behaviour could not be extended to cover transports. Internally, transports are represented by an additional constructor, and pattern-matching definitions must

their transports are also open) often generates many more transports than the comparable construction with paths would. As an example, compare the proof of ua? Eq below has four pending transports, whereas constructors of some other inductive type, pattern-matching definitions will not compute when applied to transports. For specific unsupported cases, see What works, and what doesn’t. If the UnsupportedIndexedMatch warning for every definition whose computational behaviour could not be extended to cover transports. Internally, transports are represented by an additional constructor, and pattern-matching definitions must

their transports are also open) often generates many more transports than the comparable construction with paths would. As an example, compare the proof of ua? Eq below has four pending transports, whereas constructors of some other inductive type, pattern-matching definitions will not compute when applied to transports. For specific unsupported cases, see What works, and what doesn’t. If the UnsupportedIndexedMatch warning for every definition whose computational behaviour could not be extended to cover transports. Internally, transports are represented by an additional constructor, and pattern-matching definitions must