that they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

that they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

that they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

that they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. 3.14.1 Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. 3.14.1 Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. 3.14.1 Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. 3.14.1 Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

that they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic

that they are solved rules out many useful cases in practice. Tactic arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using the @(tactic t) attribute, where t : Term hole v thm : (a b : Nat) → plus-to-times (a + b) ≡ a * b thm a b = refl Macros lets you write tactics that can be applied without any syntactic overhead. For instance, suppose you have a solver: magic magic tactic as a normal function: thm : ¬ P ≡ NP thm = by-magic Tactic Arguments You can declare tactics to be used to solve a particular implicit argument using a @(tactic t) annotation. The provided tactic