restrictions need to be recalculated on every request in edit and structure mode, which is of n² complexity (n: number of plugins). While the plugin restrictions can be widely customized, the standard implementation Treebeard implementation was performance, here the standard Django ORM could not provide the query complexity and performance required, individual implementations for the different SQL dialects was implemented

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the &, |, and ^ operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, Q to use, from an attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms is greater than the two forms used in English (‘object’for the singular and ‘objects’for

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the &, |, and ^ operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, Q objects to use, from an attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms [https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Plural-forms] is greater

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the &, |, and ^ operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, Q to use, from an attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms is greater than the two forms used in English (‘object’for the singular and ‘objects’for

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the &, |, and ^ operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, Q objects to use, from an attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms [https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Plural-forms] is greater

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the &, |, and ^ operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, Q to use, from an attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms is greater than the two forms used in English (‘object’for the singular and ‘objects’for

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the &, |, and ^ operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, Q objects to use, from an attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms [https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Plural-forms] is greater

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the & and | operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, Q objects use, from a simple attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms is greater than the two forms used in English (‘object’ for the singular and ‘objects’

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the & and | operators and use par- enthetical grouping. Also, Q objects use, from a simple attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms is greater than the two forms used in English (‘object’ for the singular and ‘objects’

clause: WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%' You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining Q objects with the & and | operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, Q objects to use, from an attribute, to a fully dynamic, callable hook. These options seem to add hollow complexity for simple situations, but without them, more advanced designs would be limited. Using class-based useful when you need your Django application to be localizable to languages where the number and complexity of plural forms is greater than the two forms used in English (‘object’ for the singular and ‘objects’