optimizations "closes loop" between tool and human's goalevolve here's where your code could be more efficient maybe, you figure it out "closes loop" between tool and human's goal profiler that suggests optimizationsevolve optimizationsevolve profiler that suggests optimizations "closes loop" between tool and human's goal here's where your code could be more efficient maybe, you figure it out I figured out where your code "close loop" between tool and human's goalevolve exploit niche "close loop" between tool and human's goal static and dynamic information"close loop" between tool and human's goal static and dynamic

11 • We are human!Why is Testing Important? 12 • We are human! • Making Mistakes: Every human is really, really good at making mistakesWhy is Testing Important? 13 • We are human! • Making Mistakes: Mistakes: Every human is really, really good at making mistakes • Being annoyed when OTHER people make mistakesTestability 14Testability 15 • Unit TestsTestability 16 • Unit Tests • TDDTestability

colors, genders, religious views, talents, etc. Comparison to human language • C++ is a language, So Let’s Compare how we learn our Human Languages. According to the FAQ Section on Language Acquisition Closer to Children Through “Baby Talk” How Does this Map to Learning C++ • We need to bring the human interaction into it. • Through our Communities, Our Work Environments • I believe this to be one of

com/document/d/14E0BYqsH_d7fMKvXvaZWoNWtIC65c YBw0aZp4dlev0Q/edit#heading=h.yt0hxah53p9e Rule decidability • Human review • Generally simple rules • Code snippets • Basic syntax matches intention • Automated tool tools of this generation, may be doable with whole program analysis • Intention is hidden • Both Human and Automated tools • Generally simple cases • Intention is shown in syntax • Neither are good • Very wonder if an [[intention:]] attribute might help Where should parallel/concurrency/hetero rules go? Human decidable Tool decidable Suitable tools in order of preference Easy Easy C++CG, MISRA tools Easy

Represent C++ Programs? • Our programs are represented by source code • Source code is expressed in human-readable text files • We typically have three kinds of source code • Header files (headers) – generally Building a C++ Executable • Builds are accomplished by compilation and linking • Why? • Our human-readable text files must be converted to binary machine language CppCon 2020 - The Structure of K E W B C O M P U T I N G Building a C++ Executable • Compilation • The process of converting human-readable source code into binary object files • From a high-level perspective, there are four stages

this Going? • We need to assess how AI will influence programming language design • We now assume human production and consumption; that is being challenged • We need to figure: • What is the spec? Is Current LLM technology akin to an extra engineer, not a language feature • 100 lines/s way faster than human, but 100x slower than reflection • Not as reliable as vetted code that generates code • Reflection

information processing tasks • We want to write programs (in some human-readable language) to help us accomplish these complex tasks • Human-readable, for productivity • We want tools that robustly and

concurrently 9Human Psychology 10 ● The reality is that we have to multitask: ○ We balance work, family, to-do lists, 8 half-finished hobby C++ programming projects, etc. ● Our brains (i.e., human cpus)

game On each round the AI: 1. Chooses Rock, Paper or Scissors uniformly at random 2. Infers the human’s hand gesture 3. Computes the outcome 42 / 50Summary 43 / 50Recap Task Model Inference Image

no specificity and prescriptiveness ❖ No strong language (only recommendations) ❖ Usability and human factors engineering aspects ❖ Requirements and system design errors ❖ Non-linear/indirect interactions