FooService interface: Java // the service interface that we want to make transactional package x.y.service; public interface FooService { Foo getFoo(String fooName); Foo getFoo(String fooName updateFoo(Foo foo); } Kotlin // the service interface that we want to make transactional package x.y.service interface FooService { fun getFoo(fooName: String): Foo fun getFoo(fooName: String Foo) } The following example shows an implementation of the preceding interface: 14 Java package x.y.service; public class DefaultFooService implements FooService { @Override public Foo getFoo(String

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class: package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity types explicitly. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class: package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity types explicitly. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class: package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity types explicitly. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class: package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity types explicitly. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class: package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity types explicitly. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class... package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity expect it to. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class... package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity expect it to. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class... package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity expect it to. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }

the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class... package x.y; public class Foo { The IoC container Spring Framework (2.0) 40 public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // expect it to. When setAccounts(Map accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } }